tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-72867335668044836402024-03-14T06:51:31.840+03:00L o r d R a jThoughts, Views, Opinions..
Feel free to comment.L o r d R a jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09508058266036538375noreply@blogger.comBlogger3654125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7286733566804483640.post-60559804124549136232019-03-02T10:40:00.001+03:002019-03-02T10:40:51.436+03:00QED<p><img style="margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto; float: none; display: block;" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/kDciLyKDZUfSJmIBJGpZXDChYT-b44udQV6ZoYyWeGIwi-1d8_dgoizRDU_MaA_AYmYb1ZMkthwmLbICMw5ABls2bJl87HmzJ17iGYwpworMuA9eFZZTnLRgzpfa67lbINT5C6flaYrzOAGcRUh_2wju2_qj8jx1tTaMMYINKvyAlscTO-WddtJ9WMerCOLPMWP52UzHgCeDbmQNSl85dJ1Um1V84gYE9sTveTzCI6Yul7uo2ZJTrBPVjMkaC0pmGmhVqyrqf970YI4qsBDq9lxYQ3va7mtECdDrNy1QDxIb9JopPjk62qqVndTzGqE1u2DHF5yn4ARPH54s7d56mVLYw5hO8NXdEJwE01es5zCFfjlV9umUa2F2j0P9Q-wCQhXsL_Ex23TGPZglH11WZDiWQdQ_W5ah9H8TP-Dgc1tI0si9TKSVZ2sqO6nbz_3A4V6HLhFNwyH0YiJXv1Bv7hu_TeDQikptul1hiZgH5jCsLtC_cztDeSkS3uEbWy6jgkYDgj5RgZM-xS5QQGNRP2EkUEqYV68ZdpHKmun8i32TiMKHi1VYLWFjSfQWuaHBkJth8x56n19ga3-q4nrUauO2ifeBZuDHBxlZx3JDQjO5JwAIWM68_3EgHIFMJIzDCSzheIlnEJURBxpQNrpNKodzOb4AR0Y=w827-h768-no"></p><p><br></p><p align="justify"><a title="BBC Link" href="https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-47387270" target="_blank">Link</a></p><p align="justify"><strong><br></strong></p><p align="justify"><strong>Answer:</strong> Because you have way too much time on your hands.</p>L o r d R a jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09508058266036538375noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7286733566804483640.post-57981493242493997602018-04-29T11:34:00.001+03:002018-04-29T11:34:58.720+03:00India: Death Penalty If Convicted Of Rape Of Minor<h3><font size="2"><font style="font-weight: normal;"><a title="TOI Link" href="https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/death-penalty-for-rape-of-minors-president-approves-ordinance/articleshow/63873817.cms" target="_blank">Death penalty for rape of minors: President approves ordinance</a></font></font></h3> <p align="justify">What’s wrong with extending the rule / law to every convicted rapist? Why is there a need to create this distinction?</p> <p align="justify">The prosecution and the defense teams are still expected to make their own respective case and present plausible evidence / witness / testimony.</p> <p align="justify">The right to appeal against the verdict <em>(whatever it may be)</em> would be available to be exercised.</p> <p align="justify">Rape is a horrific and senseless crime. If a court convicts an accused of the rape charges, then why should the age of the victim <em>(or that of the accused)</em> matter?</p>L o r d R a jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09508058266036538375noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7286733566804483640.post-83929010658937406192018-04-29T08:00:00.001+03:002018-04-29T08:00:17.397+03:00Modi Mad About Masala To Media… Hmm<p align="justify">On April 18th, the <strike>Chutiya</strike> Chief Minister of Tripura made a remark “Internet and satellite communication had existed in the days of Mahabharata…” [<a href="https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/agartala/internet-and-satellite-existed-since-mahabharata-era-claims-tripura-cm/articleshow/63808175.cms" target="_blank">Link</a>].</p> <p align="justify">This seemed to have upset <strike>Madarchod</strike> Modi ji a bit, and a few days later, <a title="TOI Link" href="https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/dont-speak-out-of-turn-dont-give-media-masala-pm-modi-to-bjp-mps-mlas/articleshow/63868347.cms" target="_blank">Modi had a chat with the party members and lawmakers</a>: </p> <p><img title="1" style="margin: 0px auto; border: 0px currentcolor; border-image: none; float: none; display: block; background-image: none;" border="0" alt="1" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-tlfkGN4VjcM/WuVOq0Jj08I/AAAAAAAAKwY/ku4wLzEL2IUMbqipmV2ZmYGd7uAFx7jowCHMYCw/1%255B8%255D?imgmax=800" width="652" height="768" /></p> <p align="justify">Hmm…</p> <p align="justify">Here is a two minute video from Modi’s YouTube Channel, where he himself is giving masala to the media with some ill-informed statements.</p> <p align="center"><iframe height="315" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/AvFHvHNmfSM?rel=0" frameborder="0" width="560" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media"></iframe></p> <p align="center"></p> <p align="justify">I guess he just felt bad that someone else got the headline.</p>L o r d R a jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09508058266036538375noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7286733566804483640.post-39680408548138381862018-01-29T12:13:00.001+03:002018-01-29T12:18:07.835+03:00#TimesUp Movement … #MeToo Movement<ul> <li> <div align="justify">Start a Twitter/Facebook campaign.</div> </li> <li> <div align="justify">Wear black outfits for an awards night.</div> </li> <li> <div align="justify">Wear a white rose for another awards night.</div> </li> </ul> <p align="justify">Is this your idea of protest / support? What difference will any of this make? Wouldn’t it be better to just carry placards? At least that way, even the uninitiated/unaware would know what issue you are supporting and/or protesting.</p> <p align="justify">If only the solution to the issue was as simple as having a dress-code for formal events… sigh.</p> <p align="justify">Given that majority of the individuals still haven’t even identified the problem correctly, expecting them to come up with a sensible solution would in fact be expecting way too much. </p> <p align="justify">I reiterate – This is NOT a gender issue. The problem is <strong>concentration of power</strong> <em>(irrespective of the gender of the person in such position(s))</em>.</p> <p align="justify">~ Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely <em>(crtsy: Lord Acton)</em>.</p>L o r d R a jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09508058266036538375noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7286733566804483640.post-64277695649325480172018-01-29T08:02:00.001+03:002018-01-29T08:04:13.769+03:00‘Slum Stay’ For INR 2,000 Per Night<p><img title="" style="margin: 0px auto; border: 0px currentcolor; border-image: none; float: none; display: block; background-image: none;" border="0" alt="" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-2HaeZSJQaOg/Wm6qzGvliJI/AAAAAAAAKvs/AfsV8PhMfYshvSQ3qbOf4tXRsxIrTB9EACHMYCw/1%255B8%255D?imgmax=800" width="560" height="480" /></p> <p align="justify"></p> <p align="justify">Why?!</p> <p align="justify">Listen, I do get the ‘To each his own’ philosophy. I understand it. But the desire to experience slum life when you do NOT need to? THIS is just idiotic!</p> <p align="justify">Why would ANYONE want to experience this? What the fuck is wrong with this world?</p>L o r d R a jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09508058266036538375noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7286733566804483640.post-43835594683257018322018-01-29T07:45:00.001+03:002018-01-29T07:45:46.655+03:00Narcos – Season 3<p><img title="" style="margin: 0px auto; border: 0px currentcolor; border-image: none; float: none; display: block; background-image: none;" border="0" alt="" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-GQSAtSjMO94/Wm6m9wfYN4I/AAAAAAAAKvg/0gMnX0ioFCojRc1Ta_6bE9UWEF08d4VTQCHMYCw/new%2B%25289%2529-20170901073508-1170x645%255B7%255D?imgmax=800" width="640" height="353" /></p> <p align="justify">Season 1 was amazing. Season 2 was fine. Season 3… meh.</p> <p align="justify">The two characters that managed to stand out <em>(in my opinion)</em>: </p> <p align="justify"><strong>Pacho Herrera</strong> <em>(played by <a title="IMDB Link" href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2975962/?ref_=ttfc_fc_cl_t4" target="_blank">Alberto Ammann</a>)</em></p> <p align="justify"><strong>Chepe Santacruz Londoño</strong> <em>(played by <a title="IMDB Link" href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0272899/?ref_=ttfc_fc_cl_t33" target="_blank">Pêpê Rapazote</a>)</em></p> <p align="justify">The rest of the cast and the performances were disappointing. Hopefully Season 4 will be better.</p>L o r d R a jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09508058266036538375noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7286733566804483640.post-1290537062911058522017-10-29T10:37:00.001+03:002017-10-29T13:44:24.281+03:00No Exclusive Immigration Queue For First / Business Class At T3<p><img title="New Picture" style="margin: 0px auto; border: 0px currentcolor; border-image: none; float: none; display: block; background-image: none;" border="0" alt="New Picture" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-cRqZWRnwxlI/WfWFUpqc83I/AAAAAAAAKuw/Mn9MHh_cxEkUt4SI_RjaahjkchdJx2lOQCHMYCw/New%2BPicture%255B3%255D?imgmax=800" width="641" height="809" /></p> <p><a href="https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/no-special-business-class-immigration-queue-at-t3/articleshow/61282774.cms" target="_blank">Link</a></p> <p>Fuck You!</p> <p align="justify">The Bureau of Immigration and/or the Home Ministry ‘does not see the need for such a facility’? Well, I am pretty sure there are a lot of us who don’t see the need for an idiotic Home Ministry or Bureau of Immigration either. What will it take to replace these idiots with someone sensible and competent?</p> <p align="justify">If your intentions are to give <strong>equal treatment</strong> to ALL <em>(obviously with the exception of diplomats / top officials / crew members)</em>, then that should NOT translate into making EVERYONE <strong>suffer</strong> equally. Instead why don’t you focus on making things easier for everyone?</p> <p align="justify">Instead of shutting down the exclusive counters for First / Business Class, why not open up additional counters for the Economy Class passengers? There is no need to make the First / Business Class passengers suffer.</p> <p align="justify">Alternatively, you could actually charge a fee for using priority immigration / security clearance and get some revenue. Never thought of that, eh?</p> <p align="justify">Also, airlines could even come up with a sort of partnership or arrangement with the airports to extend a priority service to their passengers in exchange for a certain payment <em>(made by the airline directly to the airport in question)</em>. The airline could net-off this expense by simply passing on the cost to the passengers buying the tickets.</p> <p align="justify">See, there CAN BE a sensible solution if one were to just sit and think about the issue OR if one was genuinely interested in resolving the issue. This action taken by the Bureau of immigration clearly highlights that they have no real desire to actually resolve the issue. Their priority is to simply <strong>appear to be doing ‘something’ about the issue</strong>. It doesn’t matter to them if the suggested measures are counter-productive. The philosophy is – “Here is a problem. Something must be done. This is something, let’s do it”.</p> <p align="justify">What next?</p> <ul> <li> <div align="justify">The Ministers / Officials will look at people travelling by trains and conclude that the officials don’t see the need for airports when there are people spending more time in a train commute?</div> </li> <li> <div align="justify">The Ministers / Officials will look at people dying in remote areas due to the lack of hospitals and conclude that the officials don’t see the need for private or public speciality hospitals when there are people dying because of the inaccessibility of medical facilities?</div> </li> <li> <div align="justify">The Ministers / Officials will look at the homeless and conclude that the officials don’t see the need for people to have flats or mansions when there are people living on the footpaths?</div> </li> <li> <div align="justify">The Ministers / Officials will look at people dying due to starvation and conclude that the officials don’t see the need for restaurants when there are people living <em>(dying) </em>below poverty line and cannot afford food?</div> </li> </ul> <p align="justify">Fuck you!</p>L o r d R a jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09508058266036538375noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7286733566804483640.post-45453863932232559192017-10-14T16:17:00.001+03:002017-10-14T16:17:54.742+03:00Beyond The Harvey Weinstein Story<p align="justify">By now, not only has everyone heard about the story, but they have even made their respective judgements. This post is NOT about Harvey Weinstein. This post is about the discussions and debates that have arisen as a result of the Harvey Weinstein news story. </p> <p align="justify">It would be safe to say that MOST <em>(if not all)</em> news channels / debate panels / social media influencers, have made this out to be a gender issue with the central theme - <strong>Women being exploited by men</strong>. I do not agree with this view. It is NOT about men exploiting women. This story <em>(and a lot of similar stories)</em> is about <strong>Abuse of power and position</strong>. </p> <p align="justify">At least SOME news channels / social media influencers SHOULD touch on this point. It is sad that the primary issue is being completely ignored while celebrities and reporters harp on about the lack of women in senior positions.</p> <p align="justify">The number of women holding a position of power / influence is an issue but the Harvey Weinstein story is NOT about gender bias. It is not a Men vs. Women issue. </p> <p align="justify">This story is about abuse of power. If anyone is truly serious about addressing the issue, then it is important to first identify the problem correctly. One can NOT expect to solve a problem by ignoring the core issue and simply hijacking the story to drive a completely different agenda because it happens to be the flavour of the season.</p>L o r d R a jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09508058266036538375noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7286733566804483640.post-26691473415668945892017-06-18T10:48:00.001+03:002017-06-18T10:48:57.397+03:00IWC Portofino<p><img title="" style="margin: 0px auto; border: 0px currentcolor; border-image: none; float: none; display: block; background-image: none;" border="0" alt="" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-2iJ4PPprQlw/WUYwZjDg7CI/AAAAAAAAKtg/N9BxKzlzWwAHfGAFh6-hQYMJLGVmv10yACHMYCw/IMG-20170616-WA0101%255B4%255D?imgmax=800" width="432" height="768" /></p> <p align="justify">Got myself an IWC.</p> <p align="justify">Same story - Was hoping to find the BLNR <em>(this time in Dubai)</em>. Wasn’t available, so ended up looking at other watches in the store. Liked this, so got one.</p>L o r d R a jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09508058266036538375noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7286733566804483640.post-53607605985708357262017-06-14T12:32:00.001+03:002017-06-14T12:32:49.767+03:00Conspiracy Of The Rich – Robert T. Kiyosaki<p><img title="" style="margin: 0px auto; border: 0px currentcolor; border-image: none; float: none; display: block; background-image: none;" border="0" alt="" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-c35nCTOgmVw/WUECtHuzyeI/AAAAAAAAKss/EaLnQqNB8eIfJ5JhwzxoLddmXN33v15pACHMYCw/51aznGoengL._SX322_BO1%252C204%252C203%252C200_%255B2%255D?imgmax=800" width="312" height="480" /></p> <p align="justify"><strong><u>Some</u></strong> parts were informative and made sense.</p> <p align="justify">However, most of the book was devoted to shameless self-promotion <em>(which gets annoying after a while)</em> and repetition <em>(which is even more irritating than the annoying self-promotion)</em>.</p> <p align="justify">The unnecessary inclusion of diagrams / figures / tables and two graphs doesn’t add much value if all you do is keep repeating the same nonsense for a few hundred pages.</p> <p align="justify">And then, there were typos!</p> <p>  </p> <p><img title="" style="border: 0px currentcolor; border-image: none; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto; float: none; display: block; background-image: none;" border="0" alt="" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-YMtflf9He0Q/WUECuWYuNdI/AAAAAAAAKsw/8hwZLwI-a8MLzTBINdiW-07CiydE_BlAgCHMYCw/DOC126%2B%25282%2529_1%255B5%255D?imgmax=800" width="435" height="768" />         </p> <hr /> <p><img title="" style="border: 0px currentcolor; border-image: none; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto; float: none; display: block; background-image: none;" border="0" alt="" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-xhnZBaJu9OM/WUECvqscTZI/AAAAAAAAKs0/lWuMisr9eWQswyNWBbZEj7rytDUGRDJRgCHMYCw/DOC126_1%255B4%255D?imgmax=800" width="435" height="768" /></p>L o r d R a jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09508058266036538375noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7286733566804483640.post-50777204341898389422017-06-13T10:46:00.001+03:002017-06-14T12:47:52.683+03:00APB<p><img title="" style="margin: 0px auto; border: 0px currentcolor; border-image: none; float: none; display: block; background-image: none;" border="0" alt="" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-qzrgaFjhnzY/WT-YZtLYqgI/AAAAAAAAKsY/Rsx061mTkZ0qO5rhs9QYdVuAbTyTRMIoQCHM/C3NLot6UkAATKF-%255B2%255D?imgmax=800" width="640" height="360" /></p> <p align="justify">Done with Season 1. Have no interest in Season 2 <em>(If the series does get renewed)</em>.</p> <p align="justify">The first few episodes were interesting, but then it just got really pointless.</p> <p align="justify">Blonde Bitch <strong>Lauren Fitch</strong> <em>(</em><a title="IMDB Link" href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005339/?ref_=ttfc_fc_cl_t16" target="_blank"><em>Kim Raver</em></a><em>) </em>seemed to be the only interesting character that could bring in SOME sense to this show. Sadly, she features only 3 times in Season 1.</p> <p align="justify">Billionaire <strong>Gideon Reeves </strong><em>(</em><a title="IMDB Link" href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005095/?ref_=ttfc_fc_cl_t1" target="_blank"><em>Justin Kirk</em></a><em>) </em>is tolerable <em>(at best)</em>.</p> <p align="justify">Officer <strong>Nicholas Brandt</strong> <em>(<a title="IMDB Link" href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0359623/?ref_=ttfc_fc_cl_t3" target="_blank">Taylor Handley</a>)</em> keeps yapping about his military tours. Shut up, already!</p> <p align="justify">Detective <strong>Theresa Murphy </strong><em>(</em><a title="IMDB Link" href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2358540/?ref_=ttfc_fc_cl_t2" target="_blank"><em>Natalie Martinez</em></a><em>)</em> is annoying with her Holier-Than-Thou / Know-it-all / Street-Smart shit. Sequences between Detective Murphy and her family <em>(mom/son/ex-husband)</em> are torture!</p> <p align="justify"></p> <p align="justify">Rest of the cast – Supporting or otherwise – is Rubbish.</p>L o r d R a jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09508058266036538375noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7286733566804483640.post-2791347838786541272017-06-13T10:10:00.001+03:002017-06-13T10:10:46.676+03:00…<p><img title="" style="margin: 0px auto; border: 0px currentcolor; border-image: none; float: none; display: block; background-image: none;" border="0" alt="" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-6g040n0E1XA/WT-P9IolZ8I/AAAAAAAAKsI/-Xhx48TO6PkNyzyerBpNh3Gl3VXYajTnACHM/Screenshot_20170613-092252%255B5%255D?imgmax=800" width="640" height="219" /></p> <p align="justify">Ahh. I have finally figured it out!</p> <p align="justify">It is my mistake; to expect the device / OS to work/operate/behave in a sensible/logical manner. I mean, these people can’t even spell! Expecting them to understand the core purpose of a device is OBVIOUSLY too much to expect!</p>L o r d R a jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09508058266036538375noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7286733566804483640.post-60677585123835146122017-06-13T09:52:00.001+03:002017-06-14T13:14:25.668+03:00Breitling Transocean Day Date<p><img title="" style="margin: 0px auto; border: 0px currentcolor; border-image: none; float: none; display: block; background-image: none;" border="0" alt="" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-J1FpiW8QAtk/WT-Lt4h7glI/AAAAAAAAKr8/Hst9Fj8eCQcYEhCPJmeiXyVxSTv6GNOXACHM/transocean-day-date-2%255B5%255D?imgmax=800" width="639" height="480" /></p> <p align="justify">I was looking for the <a href="https://www.rolex.com/watches/gmt-master-ii/m116710blnr-0002.html" target="_blank">Batman (BLNR)</a>. When I couldn’t find that, I walked into Breitling and was pretty sure I would get a Navitimer. However, it was extremely difficult to ignore this Transocean Day Date. Simple. Stately. Clean.</p> <p align="justify">That said, I am not sure how long I will continue to like this one… </p>L o r d R a jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09508058266036538375noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7286733566804483640.post-39368619865483565752017-06-05T09:31:00.001+03:002017-06-05T09:31:44.804+03:00BlackBerry Mercury<p><img title="" style="border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; float: none; padding-top: 0px; padding-left: 0px; margin: 0px auto; border-left: 0px; display: block; padding-right: 0px" border="0" alt="" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-hG6mS9XZZ3E/WTT6zRsthMI/AAAAAAAAKrU/9oDI3oafMIcodUhr0TqP4zU9CGGLgHfIQCHM/blackberry_keyone_1%255B2%255D?imgmax=800" width="640" height="357" /></p> <p align="justify">Got it and have been using it for a little over a week now. It’s better than the <a href="http://www.lordraj.com/2015/12/blackberry-venice-priv.html" target="_blank">Venice</a>, that’s for sure, but… </p> <p align="justify">The device runs on Android, which means <em>(for me)</em> it’s cluttered with shit / ‘Features’ I don’t need or care about and missing the things that I DO NEED. There simply is no escaping this scenario and I absolutely hate the fact that a superior OS had to die. That said, at least this Android has a proper keyboard - without the slider, so that’s a relief.</p> <p align="justify">The Physical Keyboard on this one is significantly better than the one on the Venice. The PKB can be used to swipe / flick the words or for scrolling, BUT a proper track-pad would make things considerably more tolerable.</p> <p align="justify">The BlackBerry HUB needs A LOT OF work on the Android!</p>L o r d R a jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09508058266036538375noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7286733566804483640.post-45167986510045780102017-05-11T07:28:00.001+03:002017-05-11T11:26:22.554+03:00Err…<p><img title="" style="border-left-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; background-image: none; border-bottom-width: 0px; float: none; padding-top: 0px; padding-left: 0px; margin: 0px auto; display: block; padding-right: 0px; border-top-width: 0px" border="0" alt="" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Sts9cqU25Rg/WRPoUcpzS6I/AAAAAAAAKqc/voEkJfgDHz4klEZpzIxwQaGi5BSIU60WwCHM/New%2BPicture%255B2%255D?imgmax=800" width="574" height="480" /></p> <p align="justify">The article goes on to say:</p> <p><strong><font color="#cccccc" size="7">“</font></strong></p> <blockquote> <p align="justify"><em><font color="#0000ff">The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) was asked to <font size="3">provide a copy of the minutes of the meetings held in its office during which the decision to demonetise Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes was taken</font>. It was also asked to <font size="3">share a copy of the correspondence made with the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) and the finance ministry on demonetisation issue.</font></font></em></p> <p align="justify"><em><font color="#0000ff">…</font></em><em><font color="#0000ff">"Disclosure of such information would detriment economic interest of the country from the viewpoint of the objectives sought to be achieved by such decision," the RBI said in reply to the RTI application filed by a PTI correspondent.</font></em></p> <p align="justify"><em><font color="#0000ff">It is also likely to impede future economic or fiscal policies of Government of India, the central bank said. <font size="3">The disclosure of information, therefore, qualifies for exemption under section 8 (1) (a) of the Right to Information (RTI) Act</font>…</font></em></p> </blockquote> <p><a href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/sharing-note-ban-process-details-will-affect-indias-economic-interests-rbi/articleshow/58609128.cms" target="_blank">Link</a></p> <p align="justify">There are plenty of us who hold the opinion that there are NO MINUTES, because this shitty decision was taken arbitrarily by ‘King Narendra’. </p> <p align="justify">Any ‘meetings’ that might have taken place would simply be - the PM / some idiot from that bunch - DICTATING to the RBI Governor as to what is expected of him. All the correspondences <em>(formal / informal)</em> involving the PMO-RBI-Finance Ministry would simply be about ‘Damage Control and/or managing the situation <em>(read media)</em>’.</p> <p align="justify">That said… how hard is it to just WRITE UP a set of back-dated minutes showing a wide ranging discussion, conducted at an undisclosed location - to ensure confidentiality, touching on several points, including the effectiveness of demonetization of existing high denomination notes. ?!!?</p> <ul> <li> <div align="justify">Just come up with a set of minutes.</div> </li> <li> <div align="justify">Look up at the previous calendar schedules.</div> </li> <li> <div align="justify">Find a date and/or time that doesn’t place you <em>(and the supposed participants)</em> at any other verifiable event / meeting / place.</div> </li> <li> <div align="justify">Mark said manufactured minutes as Minutes of a ‘CONFIDENTIAL / TOP SECRET MEETING’.</div> </li> </ul> <p align="justify">This counters any staff from RBI or PMO expressing no recollection of such a ‘meeting’.</p> <p align="justify">PMO and/or RBI can’t bother themselves for even this? Is that too hard? Or are you cunts just too lazy to come up with a sensible cover up?</p> <p align="justify">Guess it’s just easier to use some crap like the Official Secrets Act or similar caveats.</p>L o r d R a jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09508058266036538375noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7286733566804483640.post-23791236230742534712017-05-10T07:19:00.001+03:002017-05-10T07:19:17.430+03:00STOP!<p align="justify"><a title="BBC Link" href="http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-39434313" target="_blank">French artist turns chicken for three-week egg hatching</a></p> <blockquote> <p align="justify"><font color="#0000ff"><em>He will live inside a glass vivarium until his charges hatch, watched by visitors to the Palais de Tokyo museum in Paris.</em></font></p> </blockquote> <p><img title="" style="border-left-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; background-image: none; border-bottom-width: 0px; float: none; padding-top: 0px; padding-left: 0px; margin: 0px auto; display: block; padding-right: 0px; border-top-width: 0px" border="0" alt="" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-b_rXarENS_Q/WRKUsLWFybI/AAAAAAAAKqA/Rt2KxtVTFEQNU0Vr-4qQv0GW3UHt8nd_ACHM/1%255B2%255D?imgmax=800" width="640" height="386" /></p> <hr /> <p align="justify"><a title="BBC Link" href="http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-39053541" target="_blank">French artist Abraham Poincheval entombs himself in boulder</a></p> <blockquote> <p align="justify"><em><font color="#0000ff">He will become the "beating heart" of the 12-tonne boulder, he says - discovering how that perspective warps time and space.</font></em></p> <p align="justify"><em><font color="#0000ff">Poincheval is conducting his experiment at Paris's Palais de Tokyo gallery.</font></em></p> </blockquote> <p><img title="" style="border-left-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; background-image: none; border-bottom-width: 0px; float: none; padding-top: 0px; padding-left: 0px; margin: 0px auto; display: block; padding-right: 0px; border-top-width: 0px" border="0" alt="" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-iam8CopTocY/WRKUspurrmI/AAAAAAAAKqE/bypR-XG-VUYHNRol6mGLtRc0HVFtKIzawCHM/2%255B2%255D?imgmax=800" width="640" height="360" /></p> <hr /> <p align="justify"><a title="BBC Link" href="http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-26837085" target="_blank">French artist starts fortnight inside bear</a></p> <blockquote> <p align="justify"><em><font color="#0000ff">A French artist has begun an artistic performance that will see him spend 13 days living inside a hollowed-out bear.</font></em></p> </blockquote> <p><img title="" style="border-left-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; background-image: none; border-bottom-width: 0px; float: none; padding-top: 0px; padding-left: 0px; margin: 0px auto; display: block; padding-right: 0px; border-top-width: 0px" border="0" alt="" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-ywPVkvE-9nk/WRKUtJP52eI/AAAAAAAAKqI/u0Q2TIQD4iwUaURIJPgd1VMvNsHrc7G5QCHM/3%255B2%255D?imgmax=800" width="640" height="360" /></p> <hr /> <p align="justify">Stop terming this crap as ‘Performance’ and if this is all that Poincheval is going to do then please stop calling this cunt an ‘Artist’.</p>L o r d R a jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09508058266036538375noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7286733566804483640.post-8431953164226106542017-05-08T07:48:00.001+03:002017-05-08T07:49:58.900+03:00Versailles – Season 2<p><img title="" style="border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; float: none; padding-top: 0px; padding-left: 0px; margin: 0px auto; border-left: 0px; display: block; padding-right: 0px" border="0" alt="" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-flFLd-pmhi4/WQ_4jY8mvNI/AAAAAAAAKpg/WRUbzYQFr44Z0RCDu9IghlzUXpQKIu1gQCHM/3031d50934e64c0853bdb85c6e90004f%255B2%255D?imgmax=800" width="360" height="480" /></p> <p align="justify">Done with Season 2. Entertaining. Interesting. Intriguing. Exemplary execution. The way the story-line unfolds is brilliant.</p> <p align="justify"><strong>Françoise-Athénaïs, marquise de Montespan</strong> <em>(</em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1116106/?ref_=ttfc_fc_cl_t7"><em>Anna Brewster</em></a><em>) – </em>She is still good to look at, but the character is rather annoying to watch. The mopey bits make one want to slap her around.</p> <p align="justify">Barring her, all the other characters, including the supporting characters, delivered exceptional performances.</p> <p align="justify">Waiting for Season 3.</p>L o r d R a jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09508058266036538375noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7286733566804483640.post-32367736542921259332017-05-08T07:20:00.001+03:002017-05-08T07:20:41.348+03:00…<p>Came across this on <a href="http://boingboing.net/2017/05/06/heres-an-animated-gif-that-e.html" target="_blank">Boing Boing</a>, the other day: </p> <p><img title="" style="border-left-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; background-image: none; border-bottom-width: 0px; float: none; padding-top: 0px; padding-left: 0px; margin: 0px auto; display: block; padding-right: 0px; border-top-width: 0px" border="0" alt="" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-8e6GQAvTbsw/WQ_yEfR-1II/AAAAAAAAKpI/jhPr-aojTcceTJMMIorXAWG8rtVtKdUkACHM/New%2BPicture%255B2%255D?imgmax=800" width="578" height="480" /></p> <p>Couldn’t be bothered to click on this animated GIF, but I did spend a few minutes looking for another GIF to express how I felt:</p> <p> </p> <p align="center"><a href="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-9TzAtaquGQU/WQ_yFIV1x7I/AAAAAAAAKpM/JdzuaXZcRakyAfu3hQmu5G80tbHfxKXMQCHM/s1600-h/giphy%255B4%255D"><img title="" style="display: inline" alt="" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-x--GSt667-E/WQ_yFxMDEaI/AAAAAAAAKpQ/Z8kXNeep8LcUXlNuIf8oq_JO5RQpBpB2gCHM/giphy_thumb%255B2%255D?imgmax=800" width="353" height="132" /></a></p>L o r d R a jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09508058266036538375noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7286733566804483640.post-44533498813411407282017-03-07T11:37:00.001+03:002017-03-07T11:42:03.358+03:00“Stopped To Paani Puri…” Err…<p><img title="" style="border-left-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; background-image: none; border-bottom-width: 0px; float: none; padding-top: 0px; padding-left: 0px; margin: 0px auto; display: block; padding-right: 0px; border-top-width: 0px" border="0" alt="" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-pPZxJ_nsuMs/WL5x49WwVuI/AAAAAAAAKog/H_DTvRLdqIs/1%25255B2%25255D.jpg?imgmax=800" width="710" height="676" /></p> <p align="justify">Seriously guys! PROOF the content before publishing it.</p> <p align="justify">With that out of the way, let’s examine the case itself: </p> <ul> <li> <div align="justify">The CA in question forgot the keys in the ignition.</div> </li> <li> <div align="justify">Someone noticed the keys and tried his luck with the glove box.</div> </li> <li> <div align="justify">All this happened on a day when he had INR 500,000 in the glove box.</div> </li> <li> <div align="justify">Investigators suspect an organised gang and suggest that somebody with prior knowledge about the cash was following the CA and capitalised when the opportunity presented itself.</div> </li> </ul> <p align="justify">While all of the above events seem plausible, the likelihood of all of the events occurring simultaneously is... well... let’s just say it is <b>possible</b>, just not highly <b>probable </b><i>(and extremely unfortunate)</i>.</p> <p align="justify"><strong>Point 1</strong> – Let us rubbish the suggestions of the investigators. Organised gangs do NOT wait for the mark to ‘STOP TO PAANI PURI’. Hit-Snatch-Run would be a more likely approach. Especially if they had information that the individual was carrying cash. </p> <p align="justify"><strong>Point 2</strong> - Any individual <em>(with criminal intent / leanings)</em> who encounters keys in the ignition is more likely to ride away with the scooter, as opposed to attempt to unlock the glove box and expect to get lucky. UNLESS the individual had prior information, in which case… refer to <strong>Point 1</strong>.</p> <p align="justify"><strong>Point 3</strong> – A more plausible, probable and simple explanation exists. The CA in question has orchestrated the incident. Even if CCTV footage is found of another individual opening the glove box, reasonable doubt still exists about collusion.</p> <p align="justify"><u>I am not an investigator. My conclusions may be far from the actual account of events</u> <em>(I am just bored)</em>. That said, the above conclusion is the only logical deduction <i>(based on the information provided in the article)</i> that actually fits.</p> <p align="justify">Everything else… although plausible and possible; is highly improbable.</p>L o r d R a jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09508058266036538375noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7286733566804483640.post-11967860461151061872017-02-28T09:16:00.001+03:002017-02-28T09:16:11.256+03:00…<img title="" style="border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; float: none; padding-top: 0px; padding-left: 0px; margin: 0px auto; border-left: 0px; display: block; padding-right: 0px" border="0" alt="" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-WqxxuHwOVP8/WLUVqcE5_cI/AAAAAAAAKoA/aditdqfGsek/New%252520Picture%25255B5%25255D.jpg?imgmax=800" width="708" height="768" /> <p align="justify">Obviously there is a lot more that’s wrong with that country; it’s not just the President or the Electoral College methodology…</p> <p align="justify">It’s one thing to criticise the policies and / or insensitive/nonsensical remarks of an elected official. Perhaps we could even go ahead and criticise the general appearance and / or shabby/inappropriate sense of dressing. But criticising how s/he likes to eat her/his steak … seriously?!</p> <p align="justify">Trump is criticised for his idiotic remarks, his tweets, his behaviour, his handshakes, several <em>(if not all)</em> of his policy decisions. He is criticised not only for his gaffes but also those of his spokespersons’. Which is all fine and understandable. However… making an issue of how he likes to have his meat?! This is just as idiotic as making an issue about Bill de Blasio having his pizza with a fork <a href="http://nation.time.com/2014/01/10/de-blasio-pizza-fork-scandal/">[Link]</a>!</p> <p align="justify">Evidently, when it comes to<strong> Freedom of Choice</strong>, there is a huge problem in the ‘land of the free’. Not just limited to policy makers wanting to ignore it, but even the general public simply having a tough time respecting the choices of an adult for something as simple as how one prefers to have her/his meal.</p>L o r d R a jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09508058266036538375noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7286733566804483640.post-44238206620728324892017-02-27T09:38:00.001+03:002017-02-27T09:38:11.316+03:00“Brilliant In Technology” – Err… Not Really<p align="justify">How does one react, when an individual claims to be BRILLIANT in technology <em>(with reference to IT)</em> but: </p> <ul> <li> <div align="justify">Asks what is <strong>OTP</strong> <em>(with reference to online banking)</em> and needs a tutorial on how to use it?</div> </li> <li> <div align="justify">Is not aware of the Keyboard Shortcuts for Cut-Copy-Paste?</div> </li> <li> <div align="justify">Clicks on any link on any website that offers <strong>Free System Scan</strong> and then wonders how she ended up with a ton of extensions and toolbars on her browsers?</div> </li> <li> <div align="justify">Expresses shock when contacts deleted from her phone <em>(not syncing with email)</em> are actually deleted from the phone and not sent to a recycle bin?</div> </li> </ul> <p align="justify">I could go on with the ranting but it’s rather pointless. Just venting.</p>L o r d R a jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09508058266036538375noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7286733566804483640.post-13470176914515185762017-02-27T09:15:00.001+03:002017-02-27T09:15:53.649+03:00BlackBerry Mercury<p align="center"><iframe height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/aFLR1GHemmk?rel=0" frameborder="0" width="560" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></p> <p align="justify">They want to call it the KEYone <em>(The device and the name does remind me of the </em><a title="GSM Arena Link" href="http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_ericsson_p1-1982.php" target="_blank"><em>Sony Ericsson P1</em></a><em>)</em>. I don’t get the capitalisation and I honestly feel that ‘Mercury’ was a much better choice, but… anyways…</p> <p align="justify">Expected - April 2017.</p> <p align="justify">Priced at USD 549. Some people are of the opinion that the specs of the Mercury do not justify the pricing, as there are phones with higher specs available for cheaper. Go ahead and get those. This device isn’t intended for you.</p> <p align="justify">This device is primarily aimed at people who REQUIRE a physical keyboard in the candy-bar form-factor and a battery that lasts. Given that there aren’t many options available, these guys could price the device even higher and it wouldn’t be a problem.</p> <p align="justify">Looks good <em>(to me)</em>, at least in the pictures and videos. Single-hand operation should be possible. Putting up with the Android nonsense/eccentricities seems to be inevitable <em>(for now, at least)</em>.</p>L o r d R a jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09508058266036538375noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7286733566804483640.post-81916191747535149082017-02-09T07:24:00.001+03:002017-02-09T07:26:42.456+03:00Err..<p align="center"><iframe height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/iTCLFxkMQPQ?start=24&end=39" frameborder="0" width="560" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></p> <p align="justify">If you thought Bush had a problem forming sentences <em>(that made sense)</em>, well… </p> <p align="justify">And what’s with the swaying?</p>L o r d R a jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09508058266036538375noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7286733566804483640.post-48534496045705971372017-02-09T07:11:00.001+03:002017-02-09T07:11:40.325+03:00…<p><img title="" style="border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; float: none; padding-top: 0px; padding-left: 0px; margin: 0px auto; border-left: 0px; display: block; padding-right: 0px" border="0" alt="" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-nOmwUHNhLMQ/WJvr-pOEvBI/AAAAAAAAKnc/roiKw2fwNcc/1%25255B5%25255D.jpg?imgmax=800" width="815" height="768" /></p> <p> </p> <p align="justify">Talk about someone with a misplaced sense of entitlement. That’s not even the worst part.</p> <p align="justify">The disappointing bit is that there would be a significant number of daft cunts who would have paid this cunt.</p> <p align="justify">Why did you survive?</p> <p align="justify">There are simply WAY TOO MANY idiots crowding the planet.</p>L o r d R a jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09508058266036538375noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7286733566804483640.post-11871390095469868112017-02-09T06:58:00.001+03:002017-02-09T06:58:22.903+03:00Request To BBC – Can You Get Better Presenters?<p align="justify">If you can’t fire Alan Kasujja, could you at least see to it that he stops using the word <strong>STUFF</strong> while presenting the news? For fuck sake… this is supposed to be BBC! </p> <p align="justify">It would be preferred if Matthew Bannister, Alan Kasujja and Bola were pulled away from the microphones, but if that’s not going to happen, could you at least brief them on how to present the news and/or conduct interviews? Is that too much to ask for?</p>L o r d R a jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09508058266036538375noreply@blogger.com0