Wednesday, October 2, 2013

TOI Rehashing Articles

Some idiotic incidents are difficult to forget. It's even more difficult to miss out when they get rehashed.

There is little difference in the text of the articles. Definitely not enough to justify a fresh article for the same story.


The 2nd October article states:

"

However, the bench of Justices S C Dharmadhikari and Gautam Patel disagreed with the prosecution. "There seems to be very little justification for the impugned orders or even for taking the view the police claim they did. Why exactly his behaviour was thought to be suspicious, we are not told. We are only told that he has a very long line of criminal cases," the bench said earlier this month.

What exactly do you mean by earlier this month?? Do you mean 1st of October? That is the only possible date that could be 'earlier this month'.

0 Opinions:

Archives

Followers